|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A seven-month study was carried out to compare a novel approach
for digestion of wastewater sludge, the Ennix process, with a conventionally operated (Control) aerobic digester on a side-by-side
basis. The Ennix process does not require aeration of the digester and employs
mixing on an intermittent basis. Selected bacteria and biochemicals are periodically
added to waste activated sludge entering the digester to maintain a favorable environment for sludge biodegradation.
Hydraulic and volatile solids loading patterns for the Ennix
and Control digesters were almost identical throughout the study. The mean hydraulic
residence times were 21 and 20 days, respectively, and the mean volatile solids loadings were 36 and 39 lb/1000 ft3/d,
respectively. The mean solids residence time of the Ennix digester was 24.4 days,
compared to 25.4 days for the Control.
Oxidation-reduction potentials in the Ennix digester were
significantly lower and more consistent than in the Control. However, the mean
dissolved oxygen and hydrogen sulfide concentrations in the two digesters were statistically equivalent. The Ennix digester had significantly higher ammonia and alkalinity concentrations and significantly lower
sulfate concentration and pH. The pH in the Ennix digester was lower than expected,
given the high alkalinity. This possibly reflects accumulation of carbon dioxide
from biochemical sludge stabilization.
The Ennix digester achieved higher volatile solids destruction
than the Control on eight of the ten sampling dates. Its mean volatile solids
destruction was 20.4%, compared to 17.2% for the Control. Fecal coliform MPNs
in the Ennix digester were consistently below the EPA 503 Class B criterion of 2 million per gram total solids. Its mean log removal of fecal coliforms was 1.11, compared to 1.08 for the Control. Contents of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, and Zn in Ennix digester sludge were similar to those of the
waste activated and Control digester sludges and were well below EPA 503 Class B limits.
Lake City Annual Operational Savings Achieved With Ennix Digester Optimization Process:
Electrical
Savings:
$26,900
Lime Use: $19,305
198 tons @ 97.50/ton, 40% decrease
Polymer: $
6,588
10.8 drums @ $610/drum, 36% decrease
Total Annual Savings $
52,793
Authors
Ben Koopman, Ph.D., P.E., Professor, University of Florida Department of Environmental Engineering
Sciences
William T. Engel, Jr., Ph.D., Director, University of Florida Center for Training, Research and Education for Environmental Occupations
Edward M. Toby III, CET, Senior Training Specialist, University of Florida Center for Training, Research and Education for Environmental Occupations
Acknowledgements
The
following individuals provided invaluable assistance in the planning, management and production of this project.
William Cuthbert, Utilities Supervisor, City of Hawthorne
©Copyright 2004 University of Florida TREEO Center
|